The Outback has standard Whiplash-Reducing Front Seats, which use a specially designed seat to protect the driver and front passenger from whiplash. During a rear-end collision, the Whiplash-Reducing Front Seats system allows the backrest to travel backwards to cushion the occupants and the headrests move forward to prevent neck and spine injuries. The CR-V doesn’t offer a whiplash protection system.
With its standard EyeSight, the Subaru Outback is better at preventing collisions with pedestrians than the Honda CR-V, according to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety:
|
Outback |
CR-V |
Overall Evaluation |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
|
Crossing Child - DAY |
|
12 MPH |
AVOIDED |
-10 MPH |
25 MPH |
AVOIDED |
-18 MPH |
|
Crossing Adult - NIGHT |
|
12 MPH Brights |
AVOIDED |
AVOIDED |
12 MPH Low beams |
AVOIDED |
No Slowing |
25 MPH Brights |
AVOIDED |
AVOIDED |
25 MPH Low beams |
AVOIDED |
-17 MPH |
|
Parallel Adult - NIGHT |
|
25 MPH Brights |
AVOIDED |
AVOIDED |
25 MPH Low beams |
-6 MPH |
No Slowing |
37 MPH Brights |
AVOIDED |
-33 MPH |
Warning Issued-Brights |
2.7 sec |
2.4 sec |
37 MPH Low beams |
-4 MPH |
No Slowing |
Warning Issued-Low beams |
1.1 sec |
No Warning |
To provide maximum traction and stability on all roads, All-Wheel Drive is standard on the Outback. But it costs extra on the CR-V.
The Subaru Outback’s rear backup camera has a standard washer for maintaining a clear view under various conditions. In contrast, the Honda CR-V does not offer a rear camera washer, meaning its effectiveness relies on manual cleaning by the user when necessary.
Both the Outback and the CR-V have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, driver knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, front and rear seatbelt pretensioners, height adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, rearview cameras, available blind spot warning systems, rear parking sensors, rear cross-path warning and driver alert monitors.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Subaru Outback is safer than the Honda CR-V:
|
Outback |
CR-V |
OVERALL STARS |
5 Stars |
4 Stars |
|
Driver |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
158 |
211 |
Leg Forces (l/r) |
230/249 lbs. |
217/317 lbs. |
|
Passenger |
|
STARS |
4 Stars |
4 Stars |
HIC |
241 |
357 |
Neck Injury Risk |
43% |
54% |
Neck Stress |
147 lbs. |
211 lbs. |
Leg Forces (l/r) |
161/137 lbs. |
408/341 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH and into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Subaru Outback is safer than the Honda CR-V:
|
Outback |
CR-V |
|
Front Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
28 |
72 |
Chest Movement |
.5 inches |
.8 inches |
Abdominal Force |
101 lbs. |
115 lbs. |
Hip Force |
247 lbs. |
347 lbs. |
|
Into Pole |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
146 |
302 |
Spine Acceleration |
43 G’s |
48 G’s |
Hip Force |
674 lbs. |
753 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.